Cone Beam CT equipment compared: PedCat, Planmed CT and CARESTREAM OnSight 3D Extremity System
Vol. 2 No. 5 (2020), Research Articles
Vol. 2 No. 5 (2020)

Cone Beam CT equipment compared: PedCat, Planmed CT and CARESTREAM OnSight 3D Extremity System

Research Articles
https://doi.org/10.36017/jahc20202587
Published 2020-08-21
Elena Cerasela Sandu
Dottoressa in Tecniche di Radiologia Medica per Immagini e Radioterapia
Caravaggi Paolo
Ingegnere Laboratorio di Analisi del movimento e valutazione funzionale protesi
Durante Stefano
Dottore in Tecniche di Radiologia Medica per Immagini e Radioterapia e Professore a contratto a titolo gratuito
blu logo articolo

Keywords

cone beam ct
scarico
carico
pedcat
planmedct
carestream
piede
foot

How to Cite

Sandu, E. C., Caravaggi , P., & Durante , S. (2020). Cone Beam CT equipment compared: PedCat, Planmed CT and CARESTREAM OnSight 3D Extremity System. Journal of Advanced Health Care, 2(5). https://doi.org/10.36017/jahc20202587
ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver

Download Citation

Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to compare three Cone Beam CT equipment used for 3D visualization of the foot and
ankle, highlighting the advantages and disadvantages of each machine. Cone Beam Computed Tomography provides
high resolution (3D) volumetric images with a particularly low dose.

https://doi.org/10.36017/jahc20202587
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of Advanced Health Care

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.